![]() ![]() I'd say this backward compatibility is not that important for converters (if you have a math-rich document, you'll not be happy with a converter that merely doesn't choke on it, you want the math to actually render) but a considerable win for editors. This avoids runaway misformatting due to _ or *. Their upside is they are interpreted as literal text by engines that don't understand the syntax. Pro: doesn't interfere with escaping parens and brackets (introduced by MultiMarkdown for this reason). \\(a link)ĭouble backslash: \\(inline\\) and \\ Single backslash: \(inline\) and \Ĭon: interferes with ability to escape parens and brackets e.g. There are frequently restrictions on when this is recognized. Pro: same as LaTeX ( $$ is deprecated TeX syntax but never mind), easiest to write.Ĭon: prone to false positives like $20 - confusing to users who don't write math. It's a superset of latex math, so could be used harmlessly(?) with these proposals. CoffeeTeX is an intriguing new option, based on a lot of unicode.Arguably syntaxes like AsciiMath (MMD used to do this), are a better match for Markdown's philosophy, but most people who care about non-trivial math support already know LaTeX syntax (which is why MMD 3 switched to LaTeX). I'm taking for granted that the content of the math fragments is LaTeX syntax. If you're adding math support to your markdown tool, I have one plea: please consider supporting standard LaTeX delimiters before inventing your own. ![]() It'd be nice if everybody could agree on the same syntax(es) to denote math fragments in Markdown alas, as every extension to Markdown, it's a mess :-( TODO: This is becoming useful as a cheatsheet => rearrange this page to be user-oriented before being developer-oriented. button on top, you need to Sign in/up to Github.]ī3log:, (implemented, need to understand syntax) If there is one such app out there, that will be where all my money goes.$\alpha$ ✏️ this is a wiki, everyone is welcome to contribute ✏️ I would die to see a reputable company reliably maintain a lightweight math note app that’s pro enough (supports all the bullets). So in 5 years my favorite app might become abandonware. The thing is, the 2 apps I mentioned that support all bullets above are super indie apps, for my favorite app there’s only one developer. A library-styled management for all notes (so Typora is out of the game).user-defined TeX macros, essentially, the ability to use \def or \newcommand to define things.In practice, this means the ability to use \ref or \eqref to refer to equations (so MathJax, not KaTeX, which does not support this yet) offline support of math (Ulysses for example says you can pull your MathJax from some CDN, but of course it’s not ideal).That’s why overleaf or texpad with real latex does not cut it for me) (Frankly to me the exact markup syntax matters little, it’s just that no one wants to resize an A4 paper on their phone. Markdown based, so web-like output, not pdf.a PC and a mobile client, or can simply be a web app.So here is a wish list that I hope can stir some thoughts in the end.įacts: there are only maybe 2 apps in the world that supports all of the following math features: I am a heavy markdown math note taker, and I see Bear might be my chance to have an eternal solution for all my notes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |